Preparing for the Elimination of the Full Expensing Provision: Consequences for Corporate Capital Investment Choices
Keywords:
Full expensing, capital investment, corporate finance, tax incentivesAbstract
Eliminating the full expensing clause marks a turning point for businesses that calls for a strategic review of capital investment decisions. Full expensing, allowing companies to write off the whole cost of qualified assets in the purchase year, provided a major incentive for companies to make investments in machinery, tools, and technology, so promoting development and invention. Since this benefit is being phased out, companies have to change to a depreciation schedule that spreads deductions over several years, therefore losing the financial flexibility many once relied upon. This change will have significant consequences especially in the industrial, construction, and technological sectors—which largely rely on capital-intensive resources. Companies juggling immediate need with long-term expansion goals may have to evaluate the timing and scope of planned expenses to minimize cash flow constraints. Companies also have to check their tax plans to maximize the remaining advantages of the phased-out clause and guarantee conformity to changing tax rules. Good management of this development requires a proactive financial plan. Anticipatory planning assists businesses to receive benefits by means of extensive studies of future capital needs, prioritizing of expenses that suit business goals, and identification of prospects to use additional tax incentives or funding sources. Good cash flow management is becoming more and more important since the distribution of deductions over time could cause temporary liquidity problems. Businesses should look at ways to improve operational effectiveness and save costs, therefore offering resilience in view of the financial changes the new tax system demands. The phase-out necessitates enhanced alignment between financial planning and primary organizational objectives. In a tax-heavy environment, firms can preserve their innovation and growth potential by aligning their capital investment choices with their corporate goals. Collaboratively, internal stakeholders, financial advisers, and tax specialists will devise customized ways to mitigate the impacts of these changes and sustain a competitive advantage.
References
1. Mintz, J. (2018). Global implications of US tax reform. ifo Schnelldienst, 71(07), 22-35.
2. Chalk, M. N. A., Keen, M. M., & Perry, M. V. J. (2018). the tax cuts and jobs act: An appraisal. International Monetary Fund.
3. Gravelle, J. G. (2005). The 2004 corporate tax revisions as a spaghetti western: Good, bad, and ugly. National Tax Journal, 58(3), 347-365.
4. Barro, R. J., & Furman, J. (2018). Macroeconomic effects of the 2017 tax reform. Brookings papers on economic activity, 2018(1), 257-345.
5. Wiser, R. H., & Pickle, S. J. (1998). Financing investments in renewable energy: the impacts of policy design. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2(4), 361-386.
6. Chittenden, F., & Derregia, M. (2010). The role of tax incentives in capital investment and R&D decisions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28(2), 241-256.
7. Bruckner, C. (2020). Doubling Down on a Billion Dollar Blind Spot: Women Business Owners and Tax Reform. Am. U. Bus. L. Rev., 9, 1.
8. Auerbach, A. J., Devereux, M. P., & Simpson, H. (2008). Taxing corporate income (No. w14494). National Bureau of Economic Research.
9. Enis, C. R., & Christ, L. F. (1999). Implications of Phase‐Outs on Individual Marginal Tax Rates. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 21(1), 45-72.
10. Bradford, D. F. (2005). A tax system for the twenty-first century. Toward Fundamental Tax Reform, 11-33.
11. Slemrod, J., & Bakija, J. (2017). Taxing ourselves: a citizen's guide to the debate over taxes. MIT press.
12. Angelo, B., Ayres, D., & Stanfield, J. (2018). Power from the ground up: Using data analytics in capital budgeting. Journal of Accounting Education, 42, 27-39.
13. Gale, W. G., Gelfond, H., Krupkin, A., Mazur, M. J., & Toder, E. J. (2019). Effects of the tax cuts and jobs act: A preliminary analysis. National Tax Journal, 71(4), 589-612.
14. Shaviro, D. N. (2003). Rethinking tax expenditures and fiscal language. Tax L. Rev., 57, 187.
15. Peterson, P. P., & Fabozzi, F. J. (1999). Analysis of financial statements (Vol. 54). John Wiley & Sons.
16. Thumburu, S. K. R. (2022). Real-Time Data Transformation in EDI Architectures. Innovative Engineering Sciences Journal, 2(1).
17. Thumburu, S. K. R. (2022). Post-Migration Analysis: Ensuring EDI System Performance. Journal of Innovative Technologies, 5(1).
18. Gade, K. R. (2022). Data Analytics: Data Fabric Architecture and Its Benefits for Data Management. MZ Computing Journal, 3(2).
19. Gade, K. R. (2022). Data Modeling for the Modern Enterprise: Navigating Complexity and Uncertainty. Innovative Engineering Sciences Journal, 2(1).
20. Katari, A., & Vangala, R. Data Privacy and Compliance in Cloud Data Management for Fintech.
21. Katari, A., Ankam, M., & Shankar, R. Data Versioning and Time Travel In Delta Lake for Financial Services: Use Cases and Implementation.
22. Komandla, V. Enhancing Product Development through Continuous Feedback Integration “Vineela Komandla”.
23. Komandla, V. Enhancing Security and Growth: Evaluating Password Vault Solutions for Fintech Companies.
24. Thumburu, S. K. R. (2021). Optimizing Data Transformation in EDI Workflows. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 7(1).
25. Thumburu, S. K. R. (2021). Performance Analysis of Data Exchange Protocols in Cloud Environments. MZ Computing Journal, 2(2).
26. Boda, V. V. R., & Immaneni, J. (2022). Optimizing CI/CD in Healthcare: Tried and True Techniques. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 8(1).
27. Immaneni, J. (2022). End-to-End MLOps in Financial Services: Resilient Machine Learning with Kubernetes. Journal of Computational Innovation, 2(1).
28. Nookala, G., Gade, K. R., Dulam, N., & Thumburu, S. K. R. (2022). The Shift Towards Distributed Data Architectures in Cloud Environments. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 8(1).
29. Nookala, G. (2022). Improving Business Intelligence through Agile Data Modeling: A Case Study. Journal of Computational Innovation, 2(1).
30. Nookala, G., Gade, K. R., Dulam, N., & Thumburu, S. K. R. (2020). Data Virtualization as an Alternative to Traditional Data Warehousing: Use Cases and Challenges. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 6(1).
31. Muneer Ahmed Salamkar, et al. The Big Data Ecosystem: An Overview of Critical Technologies Like Hadoop, Spark, and Their Roles in Data Processing Landscapes. Journal of AI-Assisted Scientific Discovery, vol. 1, no. 2, Sept. 2021, pp. 355-77
32. Muneer Ahmed Salamkar. Scalable Data Architectures: Key Principles for Building Systems That Efficiently Manage Growing Data Volumes and Complexity. Journal of AI-Assisted Scientific Discovery, vol. 1, no. 1, Jan. 2021, pp. 251-70
33. Muneer Ahmed Salamkar, and Jayaram Immaneni. Automated Data Pipeline Creation: Leveraging ML Algorithms to Design and Optimize Data Pipelines. Journal of AI-Assisted Scientific Discovery, vol. 1, no. 1, June 2021, pp. 230-5
34. Muneer Ahmed Salamkar. Data Integration: AI-Driven Approaches to Streamline Data Integration from Various Sources. Journal of AI-Assisted Scientific Discovery, vol. 3, no. 1, Mar. 2023, pp. 668-94
35. Naresh Dulam, et al. “Data Mesh Best Practices: Governance, Domains, and Data Products”. Australian Journal of Machine Learning Research & Applications, vol. 2, no. 1, May 2022, pp. 524-47
36. Naresh Dulam, et al. “Apache Iceberg 1.0: The Future of Table Formats in Data Lakes”. Journal of AI-Assisted Scientific Discovery, vol. 2, no. 1, Feb. 2022, pp. 519-42
37. Naresh Dulam, et al. “Kubernetes at the Edge: Enabling AI and Big Data Workloads in Remote Locations”. Journal of AI-Assisted Scientific Discovery, vol. 2, no. 2, Oct. 2022, pp. 251-77
38. Naresh Dulam, et al. “Data Mesh and Data Governance: Finding the Balance”. Journal of AI-Assisted Scientific Discovery, vol. 2, no. 2, Dec. 2022, pp. 226-50
39. Sarbaree Mishra, et al. “Leveraging in-Memory Computing for Speeding up Apache Spark and Hadoop Distributed Data Processing”. Journal of AI-Assisted Scientific Discovery, vol. 2, no. 2, Sept. 2022, pp. 304-28
40. Sarbaree Mishra. “Comparing Apache Iceberg and Databricks in Building Data Lakes and Mesh Architectures”. Journal of AI-Assisted Scientific Discovery, vol. 2, no. 2, Nov. 2022, pp. 278-03
41. Sarbaree Mishra. “Reducing Points of Failure - a Hybrid and Multi-Cloud Deployment Strategy With Snowflake”. Journal of AI-Assisted Scientific Discovery, vol. 2, no. 1, Jan. 2022, pp. 568-95
42. Sarbaree Mishra, et al. “A Domain Driven Data Architecture for Data Governance Strategies in the Enterprise”. Journal of AI-Assisted Scientific Discovery, vol. 2, no. 1, Apr. 2022, pp. 543-67
43. Babulal Shaik. Developing Predictive Autoscaling Algorithms for Variable Traffic Patterns . Journal of Bioinformatics and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 2, July 2021, pp. 71-90
44. Babulal Shaik, et al. Automating Zero-Downtime Deployments in Kubernetes on Amazon EKS . Journal of AI-Assisted Scientific Discovery, vol. 1, no. 2, Oct. 2021, pp. 355-77
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
