Data engineers, analysts, and scientists may collaborate better using ML.
Keywords:
Collaborative Data Engineering, Machine Learning, Communication in Data Teams, Collaboration ToolsAbstract
Modern enterprises need collaborative data engineering amongst data engineers, analysts, and scientists to provide meaningful insights. However, fragmented procedures, mismatched objectives, and communication gaps can inhibit cooperation. Teamwork is changing due to machine learning (ML) automating monotonous processes, enhancing data quality, and giving solutions that meet various demands. Machine Learning powered data catalogues help teams to identify & comprehend the datasets faster than manual research. Intelligent version control systems are let engineers & scientists that collaborates on models & pipelines, reducing disagreements & enhancing openness. Machine Learning may identify data pipeline irregularities & offers improvements, freeing teams to innovate rather than the debug. Data engineers may collaborate seamlessly on ETL pipelines, trend analysis & the model deployment by using Machine Learning driven collaboration tools. This builds trust, aligns corporate objectives, and speeds up processes, enabling teams produce scalable, high-quality data solutions that succeed.
References
1. Birnholtz, J. P., & Bietz, M. J. (2003, November). Data at work: supporting sharing in science and engineering. In Proceedings of the 2003 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 339-348).
2. Wang, D., Weisz, J. D., Muller, M., Ram, P., Geyer, W., Dugan, C., ... & Gray, A. (2019). Human-AI collaboration in data science: Exploring data scientists' perceptions of automated AI. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, 3(CSCW), 1-24.
3. Nahar, N., Zhou, S., Lewis, G., & Kästner, C. (2022, May). Collaboration challenges in building ml-enabled systems: Communication, documentation, engineering, and process. In Proceedings of the 44th international conference on software engineering (pp. 413-425).
4. Martinez, I., Viles, E., & Olaizola, I. G. (2021). Data science methodologies: Current challenges and future approaches. Big Data Research, 24, 100183.
5. Van der Aalst, W. M. (2014). Data scientist: The engineer of the future. In Enterprise interoperability VI: Interoperability for agility, resilience and plasticity of collaborations (pp. 13-26). Springer International Publishing.
6. Kim, M., Zimmermann, T., DeLine, R., & Begel, A. (2017). Data scientists in software teams: State of the art and challenges. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 44(11), 1024-1038.
7. Chiarello, F., Belingheri, P., & Fantoni, G. (2021). Data science for engineering design: State of the art and future directions. Computers in Industry, 129, 103447.
8. Passi, S., & Jackson, S. J. (2018). Trust in data science: Collaboration, translation, and accountability in corporate data science projects. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, 2(CSCW), 1-28.
9. Vogelsang, A., & Borg, M. (2019, September). Requirements engineering for machine learning: Perspectives from data scientists. In 2019 IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW) (pp. 245-251). IEEE.
10. Deekshith, A. (2022). Cross-Disciplinary Approaches: The Role of Data Science in Developing AI-Driven Solutions for Business Intelligence. International Machine learning journal and Computer Engineering, 5(5).
11. Haney, E. (2016). Data Engineering in Aerospace Systems Design & Forecasting.
12. Kreuzberger, D., Kühl, N., & Hirschl, S. (2023). Machine learning operations (mlops): Overview, definition, and architecture. IEEE access, 11, 31866-31879.
13. Chen, N. C., Drouhard, M., Kocielnik, R., Suh, J., & Aragon, C. R. (2018). Using machine learning to support qualitative coding in social science: Shifting the focus to ambiguity. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), 8(2), 1-20.
14. Tatineni, S., & Boppana, V. R. (2021). AI-Powered DevOps and MLOps Frameworks: Enhancing Collaboration, Automation, and Scalability in Machine Learning Pipelines. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research and Applications, 1(2), 58-88.
15. Eigenbrode, S. D., O'rourke, M., Wulfhorst, J. D., Althoff, D. M., Goldberg, C. S., Merrill, K., ... & Bosque-Pérez, N. A. (2007). Employing philosophical dialogue in collaborative science. BioScience, 57(1), 55-64.
16. Thumburu, S. K. R. (2022). A Framework for Seamless EDI Migrations to the Cloud: Best Practices and Challenges. Innovative Engineering Sciences Journal, 2(1).
17. Gade, K. R. (2023). Data Governance in the Cloud: Challenges and Opportunities. MZ Computing Journal, 4(1).
18. Gade, K. R. (2023). Data Lineage: Tracing Data's Journey from Source to Insight. MZ Computing Journal, 4(2).
19. Thumburu, S. K. R. (2022). Real-Time Data Transformation in EDI Architectures. Innovative Engineering Sciences Journal, 2(1).
20. Thumburu, S. K. R. (2021). Data Analysis Best Practices for EDI Migration Success. MZ Computing Journal, 2(1).
21. Katari, A., & Vangala, R. Data Privacy and Compliance in Cloud Data Management for Fintech.
22. Katari, A., Muthsyala, A., & Allam, H. HYBRID CLOUD ARCHITECTURES FOR FINANCIAL DATA LAKES: DESIGN PATTERNS AND USE CASES.
23. Thumburu, S. K. R. (2020). Enhancing Data Compliance in EDI Transactions. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 6(1).
24. Thumburu, S. K. R. (2021). A Framework for EDI Data Governance in Supply Chain Organizations. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 7(1).
25. Gade, K. R. (2020). Data Analytics: Data Privacy, Data Ethics, Data Monetization. MZ Computing Journal, 1(1).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
