Data Mesh Best Practices: Governance, Domains, and Data Products.
Keywords:
Data Mesh, data governance, data domains, decentralized data architectureAbstract
By addressing scalability, agility, and centralized bottlenecks seen in traditional data platforms, Data Mesh is changing organizational data architecture. Rooted on decentralization, Data Mesh reallocated responsibility and ownership to domain-specific teams so they may view data as a product with an eye toward usability, accessibility, and value. Three core pillars—governance, domains, and data products—are what Data Mesh mostly depends on. By use of automated rules and technologies to ensure homogeneity among scattered teams, governance provides the consistent maintenance of standards, compliance, and security while stimulating creativity. Domains enable teams with the best knowledge of their data to take ownership, therefore fostering responsibility and eliminating delays related to depending on centralized data teams. Seeing data as a product underlines the need of attending to the needs of the end user, therefore ensuring that data is easily available, consistent, and especially meant to solve corporate problems. Using Data Mesh calls for a cultural change in which domain teams are enabled with suitable tools, procedures, and training rather than only technology changes. Clear domain boundaries, reusable, interoperable data products, and infrastructure funding for real-time monitoring and self-service data management are requirements of organizations. Good governance must be incorporated into the automated process so that policies are executed free from additional work. New silos cannot arise without inter-domain cooperation, hence strong communication channels and consistent standards are absolutely necessary. Teams that adopt a product-oriented approach will always improve their data outputs, respond to comments, and change with the times for corporate needs. Companies switching to Data Mesh have to give scalability, interoperability, and strong automation a priority if they are to maintain production while fully realizing the possibilities of distributed data management. This approach helps teams to generate and deliver value more quickly and helps to solve typical bottlenecks.
References
1. Tautges, T. J., Ernst, C., Stimpson, C., Meyers, R. J., & Merkley, K. (2004). MOAB: a mesh-oriented database (No. SAND2004-1592). Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), Albuquerque, NM, and Livermore, CA (United States).
2. Devine, K., Boman, E., Heaphy, R., Hendrickson, B., & Vaughan, C. (2002). Zoltan data management services for parallel dynamic applications. Computing in Science & Engineering, 4(2), 90-96.
3. Liaw, S. T., Rahimi, A., Ray, P., Taggart, J., Dennis, S., de Lusignan, S., ... & Talaei-Khoei, A. (2013). Towards an ontology for data quality in integrated chronic disease management: a realist review of the literature. International journal of medical informatics, 82(1), 10-24.
4. Rasmussen, M. H., Lefrançois, M., Schneider, G. F., & Pauwels, P. (2021). BOT: The building topology ontology of the W3C linked building data group. Semantic Web, 12(1), 143-161.
5. Kaisler, S., Armour, F., Espinosa, J. A., & Money, W. (2013, January). Big data: Issues and challenges moving forward. In 2013 46th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 995-1004). IEEE.
6. Kostić, D., Rodriguez, A., Albrecht, J., & Vahdat, A. (2003, October). Bullet: High bandwidth data dissemination using an overlay mesh. In Proceedings of the nineteenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles (pp. 282-297).
7. Gray, J., Liu, D. T., Nieto-Santisteban, M., Szalay, A., DeWitt, D. J., & Heber, G. (2005). Scientific data management in the coming decade. Acm Sigmod Record, 34(4), 34-41.
8. Perera, C., Qin, Y., Estrella, J. C., Reiff-Marganiec, S., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2017). Fog computing for sustainable smart cities: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 50(3), 1-43.
9. Slama, D., Puhlmann, F., Morrish, J., & Bhatnagar, R. M. (2015). Enterprise IoT: Strategies and Best practices for connected products and services. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".
10. DeVito, Z., Joubert, N., Palacios, F., Oakley, S., Medina, M., Barrientos, M., ... & Hanrahan, P. (2011, November). Liszt: a domain specific language for building portable mesh-based PDE solvers. In Proceedings of 2011 international conference for high performance computing, networking, storage and analysis (pp. 1-12).
11. Sarker, K. U., Deraman, A. B., Hasan, R., & Abbas, A. (2019). Ontological practice for big data management. International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems, 8(03), 265-273.
12. Chan, W., Gomez, R., Rogers, S., & Buning, P. (2002, June). Best practices in overset grid generation. In 32nd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit (p. 3191).
13. Wyatt, J. C., & Liu, J. L. (2002). Basic concepts in medical informatics. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 56(11), 808-812.
14. Thumburu, S. K. R. (2021). Data Analysis Best Practices for EDI Migration Success. MZ Computing Journal, 2(1).
15. Thumburu, S. K. R. (2021). The Future of EDI Standards in an API-Driven World. MZ Computing Journal, 2(2).
16. Gade, K. R. (2021). Cost Optimization Strategies for Cloud Migrations. MZ Computing Journal, 2(2).
17. Gade, K. R. (2021). Cloud Migration: Challenges and Best Practices for Migrating Legacy Systems to the Cloud. Innovative Engineering Sciences Journal, 1(1).
18. Katari, A., Muthsyala, A., & Allam, H. HYBRID CLOUD ARCHITECTURES FOR FINANCIAL DATA LAKES: DESIGN PATTERNS AND USE CASES.
19. Katari, A. Conflict Resolution Strategies in Financial Data Replication Systems.
20. Katari, A., & Rallabhandi, R. S. DELTA LAKE IN FINTECH: ENHANCING DATA LAKE RELIABILITY WITH ACID TRANSACTIONS.
21. Komandla, V. Strategic Feature Prioritization: Maximizing Value through User-Centric Roadmaps.
22. Komandla, V. Enhancing Security and Fraud Prevention in Fintech: Comprehensive Strategies for Secure Online Account Opening.
23. Thumburu, S. K. R. (2020). Enhancing Data Compliance in EDI Transactions. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 6(1).
24. Thumburu, S. K. R. (2020). Leveraging APIs in EDI Migration Projects. MZ Computing Journal, 1(1).
25. Gade, K. R. (2020). Data Mesh Architecture: A Scalable and Resilient Approach to Data Management. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 6(1).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
